Featured Posts

Ex-girlfriend’s Phony Facebook Page Tests NJ Identity... Yesterday New Jersey Superior Court Judge David Ironson refused to dismiss an indictment charging a woman with identity theft for allegedly adversely impersonating her ex-boyfriend...


The Center for Democracy and Technology Defends Mobile... Last week the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) made a public appeal to gain support for their campaign to reform the Electronic Communications Privacy Act’s (ECPA)...


Canadian Supreme Court Protects Free Speech on the... This month the Supreme Court of Canada issued a ruling that protects Website owners who provide hyperlinks to allegedly defamatory content from liability. The facts of the...


NJ State Senator Will Introduce Online Gambling Legislation... In March Governor Chris Christie vetoed a bill that would have made New Jersey the first state in the country to allow online gambling within its borders. He vetoed the law...


Federal Shield Law in the Senate Currently, 40 states and the District of Columbia have shield laws. Shield laws are important because they safeguard the public's right to know by protecting the rights of...


Social Media Law News Rss

Social Media Effects Protected Activity

Posted on : 12-10-2010 | By : Julie Gottlieb | In : Social Media Policies



Last month Seth Borden wrote a very informative article entitled Labor Disputes Arising Out of Social Media, that explored the unfair labor practice of using social media as a way to monitor union or protected activities. Recognizing that social media continues to transform human interaction, Borden writes, “It is only a matter of time before [The National Relations Board (the Board)] directly addresses labor disputes arising out of the use of these media in the workplace.” In the meantime, Borden suggests that prudent employers consider traditional labor law principles and implement their own workplace social media policies.

Traditionally, an employer commits an unfair labor practice when it engages in the surveillance of union or organized activity, or when it creates the “impression of surveillance” of such activity. See Cannon Elec. Co., 151 NLRB 1465 (1965); Flexsteel Indus. Inc., 311 NLRB 257 (1993). Although the Board in Blue Bell 186 NLRB 712, 722 (1970) found that an employer is free to observe an employee openly and publicly participating in union or other protected activities, at least one administrative law judge found that an employer can create an unlawful “impression of surveillance,” even when it is appropriate for an employer to observe public activities, if the employer suggests to the employee that the employer is regularly monitoring or recording the employees’ protected activity. In Magna Int’l Inc., No. 7-CA-43093, 2001 WL 1603861 (Amchan, A.L.J., March 9, 2001), the administrative law judge held that the supervisor’s visit to the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America public website, where he saw a photo of an employee, did not violate the National Labor Relations Act, but that his comment to her the next day that he “liked her picture” did.

When applying these principles to an employee’s use of social media as a way of participating in union or protected activities Boren believes that “a supervisor’s review of anything open to the public on the internet — such as a public Facebook page or Twitter feed — will not constitute unlawful surveillance.” However, even where an employer lawfully reads protected comments on an employee’s social media site, an unlawful “impression of surveillance” may be found if the employer indicates to the employee that the employer is doing so on a regular basis or in a manner likely to reveal the employee’s involvement in union or protected activities.

According to Borden, “The board will likely forge new standards for social media use and other similar developments, patterned on the long-standing Republic Aviation framework, which requires a balancing of employees’ §7 rights with the employer’s legitimate business interests.” However, Borden suggests that employers not wait for a case of first impression. Rather, prudent employers should create and implement workplace social media policies based on traditional labor law principles. It is important to note that the Board itself participates in social media (via Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter).

For more information please read Seth Borden’s article, Labor Disputes Arising Out of Social Media.

Also please see my other articles about workplace social media policies:

  • Share/Bookmark

Comments (2)

Helpful blog, bookmarked the website with hopes to read more!

This is the 2nd occasion I have come across your blog post in the last couple weeks. Seems like I ought to take note of it.

Write a comment

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free